Posted on April 27, 2017 by Tia Lalani

The representation of Le Fou’s sexuality, or lack thereof, in Disney’s live-action version of Beauty and the Beast, is problematic in more ways than one, says children’s literature professor Roxanne Harde.

Much is being made of the Walt Disney Company’s declaration that its live-action version of Beauty and the Beast features the Studio’s first gay character, and I have problems with all of it. First of all, Le Fou, as played by Josh Gad, does not differ substantially from that character in the original animated movie. He sings the same songs, wears the same clothes, and has the same exaggerated behaviors that scream camp. What they don’t, or shouldn’t, scream is gay man. After director Bill Condon announced in an interview with Attitude magazine that LeFou would be seen in “an exclusively gay moment,” he backtracked and stated that LeFou’s subplot is only a small part of the larger film. When questioned on British Television’s The Mirror, Emma Watson, formerly Hermione Granger now starring as Belle, described the gay scene as “very subtle.” Spoiler Alert: yes, the scene, in which Le Fou happily dances away in the arms of a handsome man is subtle. It’s also sweet and lovely and inclusive and all the things I hope for in cultural productions for children. But Le Fou as a character, though hilariously campy, becomes simply an unkind stereotype, an insinuation that gay men are effeminate at best, ridiculous buffoons at worst. He is, after all, named The Fool. Still, he might be the best that Disney will ever come up with for an openly homosexual character, given that studio’s propensity for cheap and easy categorization, generalization, and narrowness of vision.

Second, there is, as expected, the usual backlash from the usual groups of haters. Schools, churches, theaters, and individuals are screaming about the film, and the conservative Christian boycott led by Franklin Graham continues to gain momentum. Those people need to understand that it’s the job of cultural productions for children—books, movies, television shows, games—to reflect the realities that children face and experience. An honest film—or book or whatever—will help a child navigate the problems and concerns and truths he or she faces. It will show that girl or boy a variety of races and ethnicities, of social situations, and of alternative sexualities and lifestyles. Children need books like Fly Away Home, to help them understand that poverty and homelessness are not moral failures, or like Heather Has Two Mommies, so they can be empathetic about nontraditional families. They should be able to see films that show them love (not sex, hetero or otherwise) between same sex couples. They should be able to see those lovers comporting themselves with care and dignity, not bouncing about like the fool, Le Fou.

However, if Le Fou is all we’re getting, I’ll take him. Last month, in this province, a young man committed suicide by hanging himself. He played hockey with one of my nephews; they went to school together; both were members, with their families, of a conservative Christian church. He was, most likely, gay. Statistics Canada has compiled data showing that 33% of LGB youth have attempted suicide in comparison to 7% of youth in general. Over half of LGB students have considered suicide, and LGBTQ youth are four times more likely to attempt suicide than their heterosexual peers. These horrifyingly high suicide rates are a direct result of homophobia, hate, intolerance, and a stubborn unwillingness to accept alternative lifestyles, sexualities, and gender identifications. We need to make our children safe to be who they are; maybe Le Fou can help us gain some ground toward that ideal. He might be a partial rendering of a gay man; he may be a silly fool, but he has fun in his foolishness and he gets to live happily ever after, as befits any romantic lead or favored minor character, even a gay one, in a Disney movie. He gets to live happily ever after as a homosexual, and that is a message needed by every child.

Roxanne Harde, English, Children’s Literature, Augustana Campus, University of Alberta. This column originally appeared in the Camrose Booster on April 25, 2017. 


Posted in Augustana Campus, Featured. | Permalink

One response to Second Thought – “It’s very subtle”: Homosexuality in Beauty and the Beast by Roxanne Harde

  • Krystal said:
    May 1, 2017 at 8:56 PM

    I am so proud to have been taught by you. This needs to be seen by so many more people. Thank you for taking time to bring clarity to this “controversy”. I, for one, cannot wait to share this film with my child.